Google

Above the fold

A recent update to the Google Algorithm is penalising websites that feature too much ad space above the fold of the website. The fold is the point at which the page cuts off at the bottom of a particular screen. The fold can be at different points for different people depending on their screen size or resolution.  If the user sees mostly ads when the page loads and not much content, they are forced to scroll down and this is inconvenient and Google is addressing this issue.

Google isn’t penalising sites for having too many ads on the page in particular, but is just penalising the placement. No one would recommend clogging up your page with advertising, but if you want ads on your site, just make sure it doesn’t fill up the top of the page.
The top and left side of the page will often have navigation tools on it; these are not ads but if they are too bulky they could push your site content too low below the fold. Try to keep as much actual content above the fold as possible.


There is a free Google tool called the Browser Size Tool. This shows how much of your page the user is going to see when they first see the page. URL:
http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/

Source: Google Webmaster Central Blog

Anyone who gets caught up in this change and notices their ranking dropping will have to wait until the spider crawls their page again, you might be waiting a few weeks before any noticeable changes take place.

Google claims that only about 1% of websites will be affected and that most typical users will not even notice a change in rankings.

Australian law firms rank well and not so well in search engines

Occasionally we publish ranking checks featuring various industries and this month it is the turn of Australian law firms. A few of them show signs of search engine optimisation (SEO), and a handful have done a good job, as the results will show. SEO causes a website to show in the first page of a search engine for a specific search. As there are millions of possible word combinations that may lead to a law firm’s website, you cannot expect to rank well for all of them, but you should try to rank for the ones that will bring you new clients.

Methodology

The top 20 results (first two pages) were checked across Google, Yahoo and Bing. Yahoo uses Bing results now, but in a different way. Normally we check only the first page, but in a few legal specialties such as Insurance, Maritime, Energy or Mining, there would have been no law firm on the first page. I have no personal connection with any of the firms mentioned, past or present. They were selected based on the ones that showed up in the top 100 results for the various keywords. So, if a site is not listed, it did not rank in the top 100 results for the chosen keywords.

Ranking with non-competitors

When searching, you may have noticed that the top results are often from Wikipedia, universities, magazine/news articles, legal publishers, law associations, or directories, which are not business competitors. However, they are ranking competitors and some are difficult to outrank. Of course, ranking depends on the exact search term used, so Wikipedia or the University of Melbourne (for example) will not rank if you are searching for “Brisbane commercial lawyers”. Read the rest of this entry »

Twitter unhappy with Google’s personalised search plans

Twitter is always on the forefront of breaking news. As soon as anything happens, it spreads over Twitter like wildfire. Twitter is often the first place check to find the most recent links, discussions etc.

In the past Google actually had an agreement with Twitter to have a real-time feed of related tweets appearing in the search results, but that expired in July 2011. These Tweets were often the most relevant search results.

Now though Google is trying to make its search engine more personalised for people logged into Google+, where results that your friends may have +1’d or images they’ve uploaded to their profile from a particular travel destination might start popping up in among the image search. They call this update “Search Plus Your World” (SPY World?). Read the rest of this entry »

Basic Malware Advice

Malware and hacked sites are more common than you might think. According to Matt Cutts’ recent video even people like Donald Trump and Al Gore have had their websites hacked.

“Malware” can be any kind of malicious code that is designed to cause problems for a computer or network. Examples of this include spyware, Trojans, viruses and worms. It could also include a hacker making changes to the site adding extra pages designed to phish customers. This means tricking them into giving out personal or credit card information. Malware may change/steal your passwords, access your credit card details or other personal information, hijack or lock you out of your computer and much more. Read the rest of this entry »

Why are SEOs concerned about the Panda update?

There has been a lot of buzz about Google’s Panda update and a lot of SEOs are quite worried and concerned about it. An SEO’s role has been to get a client to the top of a Google search for a certain phrase but now this is going to be harder to get sites up high unless they are popular sites that get a lot of repeat traffic.

This could prove to be a challenge. If your site is not already well established it could become hard to actually get established. It will also be very hard to get established if you are competing with big existing sites such as Amazon.com which has a huge monopoly on not only books but almost every product imaginable now.  The main advice thrown around to counter this so far is to sell products that differ from these bigger websites and have content different to these bigger sites.

It is looking as though Google is taking a lot of the variety out of search results and is favouring the big websites, which may seem unfair. To try and see it from their point of view, they must be thinking “quality over quantity” where these big sites are sure winners, so why bother with the smaller lesser known sites? It seems unfair but it might help consumers find what they want easier. The other sites will still be listed but just harder to find. Those looking for a bargain will still be able to “shop around” but those in a rush will probably just go directly to the big sites.

In the old days it was much easier to get your page to rank, having a well set up site with relevant content and quality links was all it really took to rank well regardless of how good your product or service actually is. It seems that Google is now looking at many other facets of a company, perhaps due to the way that websites are different to how they used to be. There is so much social integration into websites now. Most sites will have social media tabs, the possibility for customers to rate and review their content and services etc. A few years ago pages were all very static and had very little interaction with visitors. Maybe Google is just keeping up to date with current trends in user behaviour, but it is still a concern.

If your site has a high level of original content and offers unique services, as opposed to “content farms” with duplicate data ripped off from another site, you should have less to worry about. especially if you are advertising to people geographically close to you. but if you are a smaller distributor of DVDs or books, unless you are serving a very niche market, things could get tricky for you.

Many SEOs are very skeptical about the future of their businesses and their clients businesses due to this update. As long as Google is algorithm based though, SEOs should be able to adapt and manage their sites as long as those sites are worth managing. SEOs freak out every time the algorithm changes but this time the changes have been more drastic, but after a while everyone will have to be used to it and when the next change occurs everyone will just freak out again and again and again.

Copyright © TrainSEM Pty Ltd 2011-2012. All rights reserved. All trademarks mentioned are the property of their owners.
Wordpress Theme by Simple Themes